-
Traditional bag type small shop dust collectors are more dangerous than if we went back to brooms and dustpans because these units are dust pumps that recycle the most hazardous particles.
-
Many woodworkers wrongly believe, as I once did, that fine filter bags and cartridges would be enough. I bought a set of expensive fine filter bags and was proud of myself thinking I had done well, but all in my shop continued to be covered in fine dust. An existing lung injury from ages ago in the military combined with that heavy dust exposure to make me very ill. While recovering, I did a lot of homework and was pretty unhappy to find that many of these so called fine filter bags were rated by the makers. They could claim any level of filtering they want by simply clogging them with so much dust they won't pass air. Three different universities tested my fine filter bags. Each found that unlike cartridge dust filters built for industrial use with certified filtering capacities right out of the box, just like most older style small shop dust collector bags, my fine filter bags passed the same 30-micron sized particles all day until they were so caked with dust they would barely pass air. With further homework I found a few good filter bag makers. You can call up American Fabric Filter and order up a big top replacement bag then get some thick plastic bottom bags from ShopSmith for about $8 and a nice cam action bag clamp to seal and hold that bag in place from ShopSmith part number 518393 plus tax and shipping.
-
The good quality bags that actually provide their rated level of filtering are still not a good solution. Like cartridges, fine filter bags provide better filtering and much more airflow by using much finer filtering threads. Unlike cartridges, few bag sets have more than 30 square feet of surface area. We need one square foot of filter for every two square feet of airflow. A typical 2 hp dust collector that moves 800 CFM then needs about 400 square feet of filter. In other words a 30 square foot filter or even the 120 square foot cartridge filter is far too little area. Filters with too little area will clog almost immediately when used with a dust collector or cyclone because too much dust goes into the filter. Also, cleaning wears out our filters making them more porous so they pass more and larger dust particles. Rather than figure out a way to avoid so much going into our filters, most small shop filters are wide open meaning 10 to 20-micron filters that freely pass most of the fine invisible dust. Not wanting to constantly clean and replace my expensive fine cartridge filters is what inspired me to build my much better separating cyclone.
-
Although a number of small shop vendors now offer cartridge filtered based dust collectors, my hopes for these units providing significant help collapsed. Testing shows almost all small shop dust collectors and cyclones come with 10 to 20-micron filters that get advertized as anything from 0.5-microns to 2-microns. What they forget to say in their ads is they can claim any level of filtering they want provided they also don’t give us their airflow at that filtering level. Even a large open screen can be turned into a 0.5-micron filter if we pile on enough dirt and rock. It is the under 10-micron stuff that causes the most health damage. In short, almost all small shop fine bag filter and cartridge filter equipped dust collectors and cyclones simply allow most of the finest unhealthiest dust to pass right through. Rather than play this game ASHRAE sets the industry standard to test all indoor filters when clean and new.
The fancy paddles, flappers, and other cleaning systems offered on cartridge filtered dust collectors are there because these units also have a basic design flaw. They allow everything to blow right up into the filters. This means that the cartridge filters quickly plug and need constant cleaning. That tradeoff appeared acceptable to me at first until I continued my testing and found the cleaning quickly wore out the filters and the high velocity chips poked holes in the cartridge filters. With thousands of new larger holes after every use and the cleaner making that even worse, soon these fine filters end up passing all that the old dusty bags passed. You can tell when you have a problem when your shop again has a coating of fine dust everywhere. These units either need a trashcan separator, a baffle (see Phil Thien’s baffle design) or a fine screen to block these hits and much finer 0.5-micron filters before they get my blessings. Trying to protect a cartridge filter with a traditional trashcan separator does not work useless unless you strangle your collector airflow with 4" pipe. If you use the 6" ducting and 800 CFM that you need to get the finest unhealthiest dust, the airspeed will be so high it will scour the trashcan separators clean of all but large blocks. It takes a trashcan separator that is about 5’2” in diameter and 7’ tall to handle 800 CFM.
-
In the late nineties John Dillbeck spotted the idea of using an extended inlet to reduce internal cyclone turbulence and improve fine dust separation in an obscure cyclone article. He shared that information on the Badger Pond Internet woodworking forum and not long after many small shops began modifying their cyclones and dust collectors to improve separation efficiency and use less power because they were not generating so much internal turbulence. Someone coined the misnomer “neutral vane” and the extended inlet has been called this ever since. Although adding a neutral vane improves airflow it does little to help with fine dust separation.
Typical early small shop cyclone designs are downscaled versions of the large commercial cyclones we see outside most woodworking facilities. These cyclones use very high internal turbulence to do a great job to knock the fine dust from the heavier dust and chips, then just blow that airborne dust away outside. Traditional cyclones separate off about 95% of the wood dust and chips by weight then blow the remaining 5% airborne dust outside. The dust left after blowing away the airborne dust is often used in small shop magazine and vendor tests to let vendors claim 99% and higher separation efficiencies. When tested with real dust that still contains the airborne dust most small shop dust collectors and cyclones get roughly 0% (zero) fine dust separation efficiency. This puts all the airborne dust into the filters. Using a traditional cyclone designs with a fine filter is foolish. It only takes about a half pound of fine airborne dust to badly clog a big fine filter, yet woodworking makes about five pounds of airborne dust out of every one hundred pounds of sawdust and chips. This means every ten pounds of sawdust requires a filter cleaning. If you cannot blow the air outside, you really need a much better cyclone separator to protect the filters, minimize cleaning, and maximize filter life.
Wanting more separation efficiency I went back to the swirl tube physics, came up with a better cyclone design that was far more efficient. It provides much better airborne dust efficiency at roughly 99.9% down to 4.7-microns, plus uses less energy as it has a smoother internal airflow meaning uses less horsepower. I shared my research and designs on these pages. Now most small shop and even some large commercial vendors provide a neutral vane or some of my later suggested enhancements, but as of late 2011 almost all small shop dust collectors and cyclones still send most of their airborne dust into their filters. Too many small shop cyclone vendors now avoid seeming to have a problem by simply selling very open filters that freely pass the dust their systems cannot separate. One vendor actually claims their design is so efficient that most only need to clean the filters a couple of times a year. My particle testing showed that vendor’s filter was so open it freely passed 30-micron and smaller particles.
-
Upgrading to a cyclone can be expensive, so many want to add a cartridge to their existing dust collector to keep from recycling the unhealthiest fine dust. Stopping fine dust recirculation helps, but is generally not enough to make your shop air safe because most dust collectors move too little air to capture much of the fine dust as its source. Careful engineering and testing shows most of our larger small shop sized tools need hood upgrades and a real 800 CFM to effectively capture the fine dust as it is made to meet OSHA recommended air quality and a full 1000 CFM to meet the EPA, medical and European air quality standards for woodworking shops. Although many dust collectors claim far higher CFM output, the vendors make their ratings with no hose, no duct, no bags, no filter, and often a special hyperbolic inlet to maximize airflow. Under real working conditions, most small shop dust collectors provide about half their advertised airflow, far too little to effectively capture the fine dust at its source. Except for the Delta and Jet 1.5 hp, none of the dust collectors I tested moved the minimum 800 CFM with anything less than a 12” diameter impeller and real 2 hp motor and it takes a full 3 hp motor with 14" diameter impeller to move the 1000 CFM we really need for good fine dust collection. The Jet and Delta 1.5 come close because they use more efficient larger impellers and better engineered blower housings than the other units I tested. Unfortunately, getting a 2 hp or even 3 hp dust collector does not ensure moving the needed CFM. A number of the 2 hp collectors I tested including the Harbor Freight 2 hp (Which is really a 1.6 hp unit), Grizzly 1029 2 hp, Reliant 2 hp, King 2 hp, and PSI 2 hp dust collectors failed to move 800 CFM due to small impellers, poor blower designs, and restrictions. So, at a minimum you need 6” blower inlet, 5” blower outlet and 11.5” diameter or larger impeller to get at least 800 CFM. Although you can significantly reduce the fine dust in your shop air with a cartridge filter upgrade, you are not going to collect that fine dust at the source unless you have a big enough dust collector and upgraded hoods.
-
With it only taking the slightest breeze to move fine dust, many don’t understand why collecting fine dust takes double the airflow needed to collect the chips and sawdust you can get with a broom. Airspeed when blowing falls off slowly as the air travels away. A stream of air can carry many feet before its speed falls so much that it will no longer move fine particles. This is not the case with sucking, because sucking pulls from all directions equally. This causes the airspeed to fall off at 4 times pi times the distance squared which is the area formula for a sphere. We already know how this works. Think about using a shop vacuum. Just a few inches away from a vacuum you can barely feel any air movement at all. To test this wet a finger and see how far you can move it from your lips and still feel blown air. Wet it again and see how far away you can feel sucked air. Most of us can feel our blown air as far as we can reach, but no longer feel sucked air just a tiny distance from our lips. The result is blown air can launch and keep fine dust suspended in our shops air for hours, but to get rid of that airborne dust we have to move a huge amount of sucked air. So in short we need good hoods to control the fine dust before it escapes then move lots of air to capture it before our normal shop air currents blow it all over.
-
The more air a blower impeller pushes, the harder the blower motor works. Trying to move too much air can easily over stress your blower motor. The increased airflow from adding a cartridge filter and larger ducting can potentially burn up a dust collector motor from working too hard trying to move too much air. Cartridge filters have so much surface area that the resistance can fall too low. This can double total airflow. Likewise, moving from smaller to larger ducting can also move so much air we can easily burn up our dust collectors when shifting from 4” to the 6” diameter ducting needed to move enough air at our larger machines for good fine dust collection. I recommend you use an amp meter before and after adding a cartridge to ensure the motor does not draw too much current and burn up. Adding more ducting or a partially closed blast gate before the blower inlet can cure this problem.
-
Not every dust collector can be upgraded by just adding a cartridge. I have not heard of anyone having a problem adding a cartridge filter to 1 hp and smaller dust collectors. I’ve heard that many have successfully added cartridge filters to the 1.5 hp and larger collectors, but almost all have problems. The issue is almost all dust collectors come with a fairly inefficient or just plain no separation ring and poor inlet design. This allows far too many heavier chips and volume of dust to blow up into our cartridge filters. Not only do the chips punch holes, the chips and sawdust gets stuck in the pleats creating a cleaning nightmare. All can be fixed by replacing the bag tree ring with your own separator.